Katharina Hobgarski vs Nadine Abid Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
K. Hobgarski vs N. Abid

GER
1
Win
Played
0
Win

TUN
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Hobgarski 1 - 0 Abid
They have played 2 sets in total, with Katharina Hobgarski winning 2 and Nadine Abid winning 0. The last match between Katharina Hobgarski and Nadine Abid was at the W15 Monastir, 19-02-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Katharina Hobgarski getting the victory 6-1 6-0.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Hobgarski | 1 |
| Abid | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W15 Monastir(02-19-25)
K. Hobgarski vs N. Abid H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $39,739 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 65.14% (383-205) | Career Total W/L | 13.89% (5-31) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 19 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
K. Hobgarski vs N. Abid Match Preview:
Recent Performance and Match Prediction: In the past six months, there has been a notable discrepancy in second serve performance between Hobgarski and Abid. Hobgarski has displayed an impressive success rate of 42.58% in winning points on their second serve, while Abid falls slightly behind at 36.17%. It is worth emphasizing the strong correlation between this statistic and the accuracy of match predictions.
Insights from Return Game Statistics: Analyzing recent form, it becomes evident that Hobgarski has excelled in returning their opponent's second serve points, securing an impressive 60.48% success rate. Comparatively, Abid has shown proficiency with a 54.1% success rate in this aspect. For first serve returns, the numbers stand at 45.43% for Hobgarski and 29.9% for Abid, indicating a significant factor in favor of Hobgarski in this particular head-to-head matchup.
Under Pressure Analysis: When considering how players perform under pressure, Hobgarski has shown resilience in saving an impressive 52.4% of breakpoints in recent matches. Abid, on the other hand, has managed to save 35% of breakpoints. This statistical analysis provides valuable insights for in-game betting predictions.
Performance Overview: Taking into account the results spanning the past year, Hobgarski has proven their dominance by winning 69.64% of their matches (W/L 39/17), while Abid has struggled, triumphing in only 13.33% (W/L 2/13). These figures provide an overall head-to-head prediction overview.
Identifying the Best Surface: Examining the players' career win percentages on different surfaces, it is evident that Hobgarski excels on Clay, boasting an impressive 67% win rate (W/L 272/135). Conversely, their performance on Grass is subpar, with a 0% win rate (W/L 0/2). Abid's career win percentage favors Hard surfaces, where they secure a 14% win rate (W/L 5/30), while their worst performance is also on Hard, winning only 14% (W/L 5/30).
Player Level: In the past year, Hobgarski has predominantly competed in the Challengers/ITF tournaments above $10K level, triumphing in 66.67% of their matches (W/L 28/14). In contrast, Abid's focus has been on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments below $10K level, with a win percentage of 15.38% (W/L 2/11). It is crucial to consider the event level when comparing players' statistics to predict the favorite.
Opponent Quality Statistics: Over the last 12 months, the average rank of Hobgarski's opponents has been 460.98, while Abid has faced players with an average rank of 67.93. These figures shed light on the level of competition each player has encountered.
Deciding Set Performance: For those interested in live predictions and betting, should this match go to a deciding set, Hobgarski has emerged victorious in 41% of deciding sets over the past 12 months. Conversely, Abid has yet to secure a win in any matches played on tour. This information is invaluable when making in-game betting decisions.
Current Event H2H Statistics: While past player performance is undoubtedly relevant in predicting tennis matches, it is equally important to consider current event statistics to gauge an in-form player's performance. To access the current event stats for a player, please refer to the section below (if applicable). It should also be acknowledged that some players demonstrate superior performance in specific events, which must be taken into account when predicting the outcome.
Break Point Conversion: In recent form, Hobgarski has shown impressive prowess in converting 51.79% of breakpoint opportunities. Conversely, Abid has achieved success in 31.58% of their chances to break their opponents' serve. This statistic proves vital in recommending in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
If you're interested in incorporating models for predicting tennis matches, this article provides an excellent starting point (Warning: Suitable for statistics enthusiasts only).
Katharina Hobgarski vs Nadine Abid Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
K. Hobgarski vs N. Abid H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 1 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 0:52:35 | Average Match Time | 0:52:35 |
| 75% (27/36) | 1st Serve % | 56% (20/36) |
| 70% (19/27) | 1st Serve Win % | 25% (5/20) |
| 56% (5/9) | 2nd Serve Win % | 19% (3/16) |
| 70% (7/10) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (1/2) |
| 78% (28/36) | Return Points Win % | 33% (12/36) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
K. Hobgarski Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-2 6-1 | ||
SF | L | 6-1 4-6 6-0 | ||
QF | W | 7-6(1) 6-4 | ||
R2 | W | 6-4 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 6-3 | ||
N. Abid Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | L | w/o | ||
R1 | L | 6-1 6-0 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-3 4-1 ret. | ||
Q1 | L | 6-2 6-0 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-0 6-1 | ||

K. Hobgarski vs N. Abid Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 65.14% (383/205) | YTD Win/Loss | 13.89% (5/31) |
| 62.09% (827/505) | Sets Win/Loss | 16.22% (12/62) |
| 54.65% (6515/5406) | Games Win/Loss | 31.72% (197/424) |
| 58.46% (38/27) | Hard Win/Loss | 13.89% (5/31) |
| 68.35% (311/144) | Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 51.52% (34/32) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.06 | Aces Per Game | 0 |
| 323 | Aces Total | 0 |
| 0.31 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.14 |
| 1789 | Total Double Faults | 43 |
| 1:28:7 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 542.49 | Average Opponent Rank | 270.97 |
| 67% (23051/34484) | 1st Serve % | 58% (178/306) |
| 58% (13307/23051) | 1st Serve Win % | 44% (79/178) |
| 44% (5074/11432) | 2nd Serve Win % | 30% (38/128) |
| 52% (2655/5093) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 36% (14/39) |
| 50% (17599/35114) | Return Points Win % | 39% (138/354) |
| 16.67% (1/5) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 32.14% (9/19) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 64.27% (250/139) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/5) |
| 74.55% (123/42) | Futures W/L | 16.13% (5/26) |
| 66% (375/570) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 11% (4/35) |
| 57% (4/7) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 54% (55/102) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 75% (3/4) |
| 60% (96/160) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/3) |
| 91% (348/315) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (6/5) |
| 9% (348/33) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (6/1) |
| 27% (240/65) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (30/0) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Kimberly Birrell vs Miho Kuramochi Prediction – WTA W75 Sydney – 20th November 2025 Best Bets

Miriam Bianca Bulgaru vs Mayar Sherif Prediction – WTA LP Open by IND – 19th November 2025 Best Bets

Flavio Cobolli vs Filip Misolic Prediction – ATP Davis Cup, World Group, QF, ITA – 19th November 2025 Best Bets

Matteo Berrettini vs Jurij Rodionov Prediction – ATP Davis Cup, World Group, QF, ITA – 19th November 2025 Best Bets

Kathinka Von Deichmann vs Elena Gabriela Ruse Prediction – WTA W75 Petange – 19th November 2025 Best Bets
